← All articlesPRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE

Using LLM context windows well

A context window contains the information a model can consider during one request. More context is not automatically better: relevance, currency, consistency and structure matter more than volume. The article provides a controlled method, a realistic CTPM practice example and a concrete transfer artefact.

Realistic enterprise scene illustrating Using LLM context windows well
Short answer

A context window contains the information a model can consider during one request. More context is not automatically better: relevance, currency, consistency and structure matter more than volume.

What the concept actually means

Context includes system instructions, user requests, conversation history, documents and tool results. Long inputs can displace important passages or reduce quality through conflicting instructions.

Why it matters in the enterprise

Enterprises should treat context as a curated work package: which source governs, what period is relevant, which version is approved and what information may leave the system?

A controlled method

The CTPM practice framework for controllable AI applications uses seven stages: understand the task, clarify context and data, apply AI deliberately, review professionally, handle deviations, approve accountably and document transfer. It is a transparent working framework, not a certification.

  • Define task and impact
  • Clarify data, context and permissions
  • Review against domain criteria
  • Control deviations, approval and evidence

CTPM practice example

CTPM practice example: An architecture review includes only current target-state, interface and quality documents. Historical variants are labelled and queried separately so the model does not mix obsolete decisions.

Quality and test criteria

The following criteria make quality observable for this use case:

  • Context sources are named and versioned.
  • Relevant passages are prioritised over filler.
  • Contradictions are handled before output.
  • Confidential material follows data classification.

Risks and common misconceptions

Risks include lost-in-the-middle effects, stale conversation state, prompt injection in documents and unnoticed truncation by technical limits.

Example transfer artefact

Transfer artefact: a context checklist covering source priority, version, validity, confidentiality and maximum scope.

Sources and references

  1. NIST: Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile (2024)
  2. OWASP GenAI Security Project: OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 (2026)
  3. OpenAI: Prompt engineering guide (2026)